Mike Wise, Faking Tweets and Why It’s Not Okay

Cross posted at Sports Grid

Want to make a bunch of sports fans, journalist watch dogs and social media people flip out at the same time? I present to you your new role model: Mike Wise.

Before I launch into a discussion of his antics yesterday, I should say that I actually do appreciate Wise’s writing in my local Washington Post. I read his stuff frequently, and have definitely complimented it within SportsGrid and Mediaite. But I think Wise made a crucial judgment error yesterday when he tried to make Twitter a playground for a inferiority complex display over the way that channel is used surrounding news and rumors.

To catch everyone up, yesterday morning during his radio show on Washington’s FM sports net, The Fan, Wise thought it would be fun to toy with his Twitter followers by posting a few fake rumors. The fake stories were none too salacious (rumors about whether Donovan McNabb would start the Washington Redskins first game, for example), but the one that did take hold and passed around plenty was a claim that Ben Roethlisberger’s suspension would be five games after his meeting with the commissioner later this week.

His motive was to test a theory about what is considered credible and believable on the social status network, that those who have a certain air of authority often are believed fully without further vetting. As he told Dan Levy of Press Coverage yesterday afternoon:

“Bottom line: I picked a lousy way to show we have no credibility in this medium, in the social networking medium, and that nobody checks these things out. It was just not a good way to do it. If i had to do it all over again I would have picked another way.”

That’s the story. And it’s been discussed just about everywhere in the last 24 hours (fellow Post sports writer Dan Steinberg collected most of the responses yesterday evening). Fundamentally, most were upset with Wise for irresponsibly pulling the wool over the eyes of Twitter users, and potentially even using the fake news to drive a growth in new followers. Deadspin got a hold of the “I’m not upset, but I’m disappointed” memo that was passed around the sports staff shortly after the stunt, while others called for Wise’s suspension from the Washington Post.

All of this is well and good, and it looks good for the media organization to try and uphold its pre-set social media guidelines, which are valid. The fundamental benchmark for these guidelines, though, has nothing to do with the channel through which a journalist passes his message. There aren’t different rules for Twitter and Facebook and Foursquare. Regardless of the actual network being used, the Post’s guidelines are about journalism first:

We never abandon the guidelines that govern the separation of news from opinion, the importance of fact and objectivity, the appropriate use of language and tone, and other hallmarks of our brand of journalism.

There is more than one difference between guys like Mike Wise and writers like those I get to join at a blog like SportsGrid. For example, Dan, Glenn and I have all Twitter accounts, but we established these ourselves and no one will really run to the bank on our predictions, no matter what interviews or stories we get here. But for Wise, he gets immediate credibility by way of that Washington Post label – he’s a good journalist, he earned it. And he uses Twitter as a broadcast – look back at his history and you’ll notice little engagement with followers but lots of story streams, often very informed as well.

Wise’s theory was that people on Twitter will trust anything from a credible source, run it without verifying, and he wanted to be able to say how dangerous that could be. What he failed to factor into his experiment was how credibility was earned, which is exactly what he could have jeopardized with his little stunt. Deep down, I’ve convinced myself that Wise wanted to make the famed “blogger in pajamas” point. Instead, he made the “journalists don’t get social media point,” and the evidence of this to me is his “I’m sorry you feel that way,” apology:

He’s only half right on his first point: Mike, nobody checks *your* facts, because you are a sports writer for one of the three most important newspapers in the country. You better believe they will now.

I want to look back at the idea that Wise should be suspended, because I don’t think he should. I feel like he’s a kid who was told not to go climb in a tree, went and did it anyway, and now has a broken arm to show for it. The broken arm is a lesson enough, don’t ground the guy.

Actually, I have a better idea: Instead of squelching Twitter involvement, the Post should force him to take a lesson from guys like Steinberg and engage his followers and those tweeting at him. Maybe if he learned a little more about what conversation is valued, he wouldn’t have had this ridiculous idea in the first place.


11 Comments on “Mike Wise, Faking Tweets and Why It’s Not Okay”

  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Freshly Pressed, Things. Things said: Mike Wise, Faking Tweets and Why It’s Not Okay: Cross posted at Sports Grid Want to make a bunch of sports f… http://tinyurl.com/2faebp9 […]

  2. Oh, wah. Cry about something important, baby. It’s fucking TWITTER.

  3. bmj2k says:

    Mike Wise was certainly wrong, but he simply exposed the whole ridiculousness behind Twitter and “social” networking.

    I fail to see how something can be called “social” when it is all anonymous people behind internet avatars who stay put and never actually interact. It is the hieght of anti-social behavior, really.

  4. Michael says:

    Mike was right. No one checks facts if you have a half way official sounding name or job. The news media are full of facts that are only half checked. If people only wrote the things that are true we would have no gossip columns. Unfortunately media of all kinds and their readers go for the sensational rather than the truth.

    • Dave Levy says:

      I think this was less about his title/official sounding name, plus these things weren’t that sensational that he was posting. Mike Wise is an NFL/Washington reporter. It is fully believable that he might know those things, and flagging them in the face of “an experiment” is a misuse of his earned credibility.

  5. warero says:

    When a credible source goes rogue on any platform, be it twitter, facebook or whatever, media sifting solutions wont work.

  6. Who said that we should believe anything we read on Twitter? As far as I know, no one did…when it comes to media, I might believe most of it from a reputable source. But when it comes to social media, I’ll check my facts, no matter who it is…only makes sense…

  7. kob says:

    good points and true.

    if there’s one medium that invites dumb it’s twitter.

  8. […] is one more story here, and it ironically proves the point that I hammered Mike Wise for yesterday: the fact that a photo that was unverified, taken to be the gunmen by organizations all the way up […]

  9. […] ~Andrew Alexander, Washington Post Ombudsman, on why a suspension was warranted in the Mike Wise/Fake Tweeting saga from last week. […]

  10. […] A Boeing 747-400 passenger jet can hold 416 passengers. This blog was viewed about 9,500 times in 2010. That’s about 23 full 747s. In 2010, there were 158 new posts, growing the total archive of this blog to 277 posts. There were 50 pictures uploaded, taking up a total of 6mb. That’s about 4 pictures per month. The busiest day of the year was August 31st with 478 views. The most popular post that day was Mike Wise, Faking Tweets and Why It’s Not Okay. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s