The evolution of the news flow

Really interesting piece from Thomas Baekdal [H/T to Lifehacker] on the form that our media consumption has changed in the last century. I love the chart he uses to illustrate it as well:


From Baekdal, on explaining what his article is trying to do:

We are seeing an entirely new way for people to interact. One that makes all traditional ways seem silly. It is a fundamental shift, and it will completely change the world as we know it. And the best thing about it is that you get to help make it happen.

Baekdal does also look to what is coming in media and believes that the traditional veins don’t have much time left at all (he marked 2020 as the end of traditional media). I still think there will always be a purpose for the loudspeaker of mainstream media that can’t necessarily be replicated in social media. Sure, it won’t have the targeting from which social media benefits, but until the access wall breaks down (and who knows, it may a little), there is a need.

Now, what should they do with that access? That’s up for the old media giants to figure out. Otherwise, Baekdal is completely right: they won’t have a puncher’s chance.


4 16 07


When I first visited the Newseum as it opened in the Spring of 2008, I was kind of surprised that, historically speaking, the most recent news item that was covered in the New Media arena was the tragic event that happened at Virginia Tech in April of 2007.

However, as I’ve thought about it more over the last two years, I think that this will be moment in mass media history on which the entire culture of participatory media can be explained. For anyone who doubts the ability of social media to drive a personal, citizen focused story, this event will be the thing to which many of the Digital Native generation will point.

It will be always a challenge for me to forget the horrific events of that day – even though I was nowhere near Blacksburg when it occurred. The reason? Because the story went far deeper than what the traditional mouthpieces of media reported. The dimension created by the immensely personal nature of on the scene videos and instant reactions ultimately changed the story – and media forever.

You see, by hearing from those voices directly – and first – it made the tragedy more than an insulated event at Virginia Tech. It made people on college campuses across the country (where I happened to be at the time I first heard) realize that the name of the school and academic building were incidental. For the first time, the channels my generation had been connecting on for a handful of years became where we also congregated as the collective zeitgeist of young people.

It was the first time Facebook profile pictures became platforms for advocacy, support as photos were flipped out for images like the one above and “Today, we are all Hokies.” Videos and tributes (like this one) weren’t reserved to only traditional news outlets.

There have been events in the past few months in which we have applauded how the culture of participatory media was able to spread a story. But, luckily, those were consumer-misguidings (like Motrin or Dominos) or averted disasters (Flight 1549). The personal emotion that came through two years ago will add to a story that we will never forget – and it will be the chapter one case study on what participatory media brings to the table.


Only 75 million used to be journalists, though

Oh, Doonesbury, you’re so clever and witty for making fun of newspapers *and* buyouts.

(H/T Fishbowl DC)